User talk:Hero King Marth/2019

Wiki Manager introduction
Hey Hero King Marth! I'm Technobliterator, and I'm the Fandom Wiki Manager for Divinipedia. I'm here to help your community, and I'm a liaison to full-time Fandom Staff. If you have any questions relating to the wiki, whether it's code-related, policy related, or otherwise, I'm your first point of contact.

I actually really like the customizations and theme of the site-- seems really well done. Great job. Feel free to let me know if you need anything! I'll check your RecentChanges every so often, but for the quickest replies, drop me a message on my talk page here!-- V  Technobliterator   T  C  23:44, May 11, 2019 (UTC)

★Marth  12:31:14|May 12, 2019 ★
 * Hey, Technobliterator! Thanks for the compliment. If I recall correctly, most if not all of the design of Divinipedia was done by 8bitPit (I've only provided feedback), so you should be thanking them instead. :) Additionally, this wiki wouldn't be thriving as much as it is now without their help. Nowadays, I'm just a lurker on this wiki, just checking up on this place once in a while. But thank you for the offer! I'll keep that in mind if I ever need any help.

Thank you
Seeing the Parry Chargeup page get approved is very welcome. I'm hoping you'll extend that to the Spin Shot page too, at least since that could help breathe life into active multiplayer again, even if V100 matches (as in no weapon modifiers) are a must for that and Celestial Firework and Brief Invincibility would still have to be banned from it anyway. MasterKnight (talk) 04:38, September 22, 2019 (UTC)

★Marth  01:07:23|September 23, 2019 ★
 * At the moment, I don't see any real reason to remove these articles. To be honest, they're informational but still contestable. Basically, if anyone wants to argue about whether or not these pages should be approved, I'll listen and throw in my own opinions. But as of right now, I don't feel it's appropriate for me to remove articles left and right without others' input, especially if said articles don't consist of trivial content.


 * Fair enough. I think the Parry Chargeup page would at least be a safe bet, the only issue being the naming as Project Sora never officially named the concept in-game, but it IS pointed out as a potential tip on the Loading Screens. The amount of recharge is definitely variable based on the weapon type as well, so it's certainly very much intended, just an obscured mechanic because its implications aren't apparent.


 * I'll agree, though, that Spin Shot CAN prove debatable. I don't even know if the developers managed to be aware of its existence, although I would be far from surprised. Of course, it does help in labbing out general DPS values like what I'm doing for this WIP, and I can tell you that certain Claws that have their Dash Rapids have the individual bullets each deal more damage over distance while involving a spreadshot effect (Tiger Claws at the very least) can use the Spin Shot technique to focus the bullets toward a singular point. And even if Spin Shot IS a glitch, Project Sora's team members probably would like it anyway, and moreover, there's a confirmed glitch I would like to document onto here because it too DOES have good uses for setting up competitive play.


 * I think the only real challenge to the Spin Shot article would actually be lack of usage from most players to begin with, and I can provide an explanation that that would be partly because many people already take issue with KIU's controls in general (I'm not blaming the general playerbase for taking issue with lack of gyro controls just because I'm a lefty who can work with what I have), and the other part because many of those who are left prefer to have weapon modifiers despite or perhaps because of how broken they can get. With how lifeless the KIU scene in general is nowadays, I think something that I'm recommending being given a shot could only help anyway. MasterKnight (talk) 03:14, September 23, 2019 (UTC

★Marth  03:28:14|September 23, 2019 ★
 * While what you've said is a good point, the main reason that I thought these articles could be contestable on the basis of whether or not they should be included as official articles is because some wikis prefer to keep strategy/mechanics content within, say, user blogs instead of writing them out on an official page. So the potential issue here, in my perspective, was really just whether or not these articles were worthy of having their own page.